Viral Video Sparks Debate Over Teacher’s Seizure of Student’s iPhone 13 Pro Max
A viral video circulating on social media has ignited widespread debate after a schoolgirl tearfully alleged that her teacher seized her iPhone 13 Pro Max, valued at GH₵10,200, and has refused to return it. According to the student, she brought the phone to school, where it was confiscated by the teacher. Despite sending elders on several occasions to plead for its return, she claims the teacher has remained adamant and is now ignoring her calls.
The incident has generated intense public reaction, with many questioning both the procedure followed by the teacher and the broader issue of students bringing expensive personal items to school. While school rules often prohibit the use of mobile phones on campus, critics argue that enforcement must follow clear institutional guidelines rather than personal discretion.
A dominant view in the comment sections is that any item seized from a student should be handed over to school authorities, not retained by an individual teacher. “If you confiscate a student’s property, the right step is to submit it to the administration,” one commenter noted. Others advised the student to formally report the matter to school authorities rather than relying solely on intermediaries.
Not all reactions were straightforward. Some commenters cautioned against rushing to conclusions without full knowledge of the facts, noting that remote judgment based on a short video can be misleading. A few speculative comments went as far as suggesting personal motives, including jealousy or suspicion over how the student acquired such an expensive phone. These claims, however, remain unsubstantiated and highlight how quickly online discussions can drift from facts to conjecture.
Another strand of the debate focused on whether the teacher involved is part of the school’s authorized disciplinary structure. Some defended the teacher, arguing that public outrage should be tempered until it is established whether the individual acted within their mandate or on instructions from school management.
Still, many agreed that the situation could have been handled more responsibly. Several commentators suggested that the teacher should have either returned the phone with a firm warning, invited the student’s parents to school, or officially handed the device to the administration. Allowing the issue to escalate publicly, they argue, exposes a young student to unnecessary emotional distress.
Beyond the immediate dispute, the incident raises important questions about discipline, accountability, and child welfare in schools. While maintaining order is essential, disciplinary actions must be transparent, humane, and aligned with established policies. Situations that involve valuable personal property require extra care to avoid misunderstandings, legal concerns, and emotional harm.
Check the video
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSfnHI0DPNe/?igsh=MTY5aXR2eXhydWNmdA==
As the video continues to circulate, many are calling for school authorities to step in, investigate the matter thoroughly, and provide clarity. A fair resolution, they argue, will not only address this specific case but also reinforce trust between students, teachers, and parents—trust that is essential for a healthy educational environment.
